Tuesday, March 30, 2010
2010 Diamond Mind Projection Blowout - Marcel Edition
Marcel was developed by Tangotiger of The Book fame. Although it's considered the most basic projection system, added complexity really hasn't shown to add all that much accuracy over Marcel, and the principles behind it are solid and should be the basis for any good forecasting system.| Projection | marcel | |||||||||
| Date | 3/30/10 | |||||||||
| Iterations | 100,000 | |||||||||
| American League | ||||||||||
| TM | W | L | StdW | RS | RA | Div | WC | W+/- | RS+/- | RA+/- |
| Yankees | 97.1 | 64.9 | 86 - 106 | 898 | 729 | 49.4% | 20.3% | -5.9 | -17 | -24 |
| Rays | 89.6 | 72.4 | 79 - 100 | 816 | 725 | 23.4% | 19.7% | 5.6 | 13 | -29 |
| Red Sox | 89.1 | 72.9 | 78 - 99 | 820 | 727 | 22.5% | 19.6% | -5.9 | -52 | -9 |
| Orioles | 74.0 | 88.0 | 63 - 84 | 757 | 813 | 3.7% | 4.8% | 10.0 | 16 | -63 |
| Blue Jays | 66.5 | 95.5 | 55 - 77 | 695 | 807 | 1.0% | 1.8% | -8.5 | -103 | 36 |
| TM | W | L | StdW | RS | RA | Div | WC | W+/- | RS+/- | RA+/- |
| Twins | 83.1 | 78.9 | 72 - 93 | 833 | 824 | 30.6% | 3.9% | -3.9 | 16 | 59 |
| White Sox | 80.8 | 81.2 | 70 - 91 | 726 | 743 | 23.9% | 3.8% | 1.8 | 2 | 11 |
| Indians | 79.6 | 82.4 | 69 - 90 | 792 | 820 | 19.8% | 3.6% | 14.6 | 19 | -45 |
| Tigers | 78.4 | 83.6 | 67 - 88 | 750 | 784 | 17.6% | 3.0% | -7.6 | 7 | 39 |
| Royals | 70.9 | 91.1 | 60 - 81 | 717 | 819 | 8.1% | 1.3% | 5.9 | 31 | -23 |
| TM | W | L | StdW | RS | RA | Div | WC | W+/- | RS+/- | RA+/- |
| Rangers | 84.5 | 77.5 | 73 - 95 | 790 | 760 | 33.5% | 5.6% | -2.5 | 6 | 20 |
| Mariners | 83.8 | 78.2 | 73 - 94 | 751 | 719 | 31.9% | 4.8% | -13.2 | 111 | 27 |
| Angels | 78.7 | 83.3 | 68 - 89 | 770 | 788 | 17.2% | 4.2% | -6.3 | -113 | 27 |
| Athletics | 78.7 | 83.3 | 68 - 89 | 745 | 768 | 17.4% | 3.6% | 3.7 | -14 | 7 |
| National League | ||||||||||
| TM | W | L | StdW | RS | RA | Div | WC | W+/- | RS+/- | RA+/- |
| Phillies | 87.4 | 74.6 | 76 - 97 | 802 | 735 | 35.2% | 7.9% | -5.6 | -18 | 26 |
| Braves | 84.1 | 77.9 | 73 - 94 | 758 | 727 | 25.6% | 6.4% | -2.9 | 23 | 86 |
| Marlins | 80.4 | 81.6 | 69 - 90 | 767 | 773 | 15.9% | 5.9% | -5.6 | -5 | 7 |
| Mets | 78.7 | 83.3 | 68 - 89 | 778 | 799 | 12.8% | 5.2% | 8.7 | 107 | 42 |
| Nationals | 77.3 | 84.7 | 66 - 87 | 748 | 786 | 10.5% | 4.8% | 18.3 | 38 | -88 |
| TM | W | L | StdW | RS | RA | Div | WC | W+/- | RS+/- | RA+/- |
| Cardinals | 89.2 | 72.8 | 78 - 99 | 752 | 686 | 34.4% | 10.9% | -1.8 | 22 | 46 |
| Cubs | 84.7 | 77.3 | 74 - 95 | 740 | 711 | 23.1% | 7.3% | 1.7 | 33 | 39 |
| Reds | 84.1 | 77.9 | 73 - 94 | 737 | 722 | 23.6% | 7.1% | 4.1 | 64 | -1 |
| Brewers | 80.6 | 81.4 | 70 - 91 | 763 | 774 | 12.1% | 8.1% | 2.6 | -22 | -44 |
| Pirates | 71.7 | 90.3 | 61 - 82 | 680 | 777 | 4.5% | 2.5% | -2.3 | 44 | 9 |
| Astros | 66.7 | 95.3 | 56 - 77 | 678 | 807 | 2.2% | 1.1% | 4.7 | 35 | 37 |
| TM | W | L | StdW | RS | RA | Div | WC | W+/- | RS+/- | RA+/- |
| Rockies | 85.6 | 76.4 | 85 - 96 | 775 | 740 | 29.0% | 8.1% | -6.4 | -29 | 25 |
| Dodgers | 85.3 | 76.7 | 74 - 95 | 757 | 709 | 26.8% | 8.5% | -9.7 | -23 | 98 |
| Diamondbacks | 83.0 | 79.0 | 82 - 93 | 725 | 704 | 20.7% | 6.9% | -5.0 | 5 | -78 |
| Giants | 81.3 | 80.7 | 81 - 91 | 709 | 706 | 17.0% | 5.6% | 6.3 | 52 | 95 |
| Padres | 75.2 | 86.8 | 75 - 85 | 699 | 746 | 6.5% | 3.8% | 5.2 | 61 | -23 |
W: Projected 2010 wins
L: Projected 2010 losses
RS: Projected 2010 runs scored
RA: Projected 2010 runs allowed
Div: Division win percentage
WC: Wild card win percentage
W+/-: 2010 projected wins minus 2009 actual wins
RS+/-: 2010 projected runs scored minus 2009 actual runs scored
(positive means they are projected to score more)
RA+/-: 2010 projected runs allowed minus 2009 actual runs allowed (negative means they are projected to allow fewer)
StD W: Wins within one standard deviation
Comments
Woo-hoo! Pie charts with team logos! Is it only me, or does the RS slice appear bigger than the Yankees’s slice (and also Braves bigger than Phillies)? Could just be me…
Not that it matters, I don’t have pie chart slice envy or anything like that…my slice is *plenty* big!
Pie Charts!
How are these standings ordered? You have Boston listed ahead of Tampa, Detroit ahead of the White Sox and Cleveland, Seattle ahead of Texas, and the Dodgers ahead of the Rockies, even though in each of these cases, the latter team is projected to win more games than the former team.
You also have the pie chart logos for Texas/Anaheim, Cubs/Reds, Twins/Tigers/White Sox/Cleveland, and Mets/Marlins switched.
Yeah, i need to fix the order of the standings and the pie charts. I’ll repost those in a bit.
Also just realized that the pie charts in the Marcels, CAIRO, and CHONE posts are identical.
Rather bearish on the Red Sox.
[5] Not to worry. PECOTA’s got the Sox’s backs.
Marcel doesn’t account for defense, so it may not give a team like the Red Sox who added several good defenders enough credit.
OK, I think pie charts and standings are fixed now.
Awesome Pie Charts!! yummy
Next entry: 2010 Diamond Mind Projection Blowout - CAIRO Edition
Previous entry: Looking Ahead to 2010: Curtis Granderson and Nick Swisher









